8 Common Mobile App Testing Myths To Bust Right Away


Launching a bug-filled mobile app interface is the best way to create a flop mobile app. It takes approximately three months for a regular application to lose 95% of users. Plenty of mobile applications had fallen victim to catastrophic failure regarding retaining customers.

With the rise in mobile usage, it makes sense to drive focus on mobile app testing. However, you can never unleash the full potential of your testing efforts if you are in the spiral of mobile app testing myths. Here are the most common mobile application testing myths to bust right away. Let’s take a look.

1. It’s easy to maintain in-house infrastructure.

A common mobile application testing myth that most businesses fall victim to is that it’s easy to maintain in-house infrastructure. Well, it’s a lot more complicated than one might think. Regularly maintaining the installed emulators and managing devices can be overwhelming. It takes quite some investment in resources, money, and time for constant updates with the latest applications and operating system versions.

Ultimately, your expenses related to benefits, functioning, and security will rise more than the amount you need to break even. Therefore, selecting cloud solutions using Android or iOS emulators is better. The overall expenses are low, which results in a higher Return on Investment.

2. Code coverage is supreme.

Yes, it’s true that code coverage is a crucial measure of application quality and is an important metric to consider. However, you should be mindful that it’s not the ultimate determiner of the actual quality of your application since security, performance, and workflows take precedence over code coverage. These parameters are essential as their failure would leave code coverage null and void.

3. Apple and Google will test your mobile app security.

Smartphones have made their way through the common masses in the past decade, making security a massive concern for everyone. Companies have tested their apps for various security vulnerabilities and are increasingly rectifying potential errors. But one of the most rampant mobile app testing methods is that Apple and Google are testing the mobile app security before making them available on App Store and Playstore.

The truth is that even though there are stringent criteria for listing an app on these platforms, they don’t check for privacy issues, vulnerabilities, and data leakage in other libraries. Therefore, relying on these tech giants for something as crucial as securities are not intelligent.

4. Test after the development phase is over.

Gone are the days when the SDLC cited testing as a single phase or unit. In the current day scenario, it’s important to realize that testing is much more than just a phase. Continuous testing is an entire process in itself. Testing a mobile app in all phases ensures quick resolution of defects in the initial stage, ultimately bringing down the cost of fixing bugs if you encounter them later.

5. You can completely replace manual testing with automation.

While it’s true that automation has been a game-changer for the testing world, that doesn’t mean the need for manual testing is over for good. Even though automated tests save a lot of time, you can’t apply them everywhere. In short, they’re not 100% substitutes for manual testing.

Automated tests work for performance testing, regression testing, and repetitive executions. On the other hand, manual tests do better with ad-hoc, usability, and exploratory testing.

6. A great visual appeal on its own is enough to sustain a mobile app.

While it’s true that visual appeal is the first impression. But in this case, the first impression might not be the last impression. You see, even if your visual appeal is average and your app turns out to offer excellent features and functionality, you can easily retain customers.

But even the most statically pleasing interfaces fail to do so if the actual features are not in line. Whatever happens, you can never compromise on the workflows or key functionalities of a mobile app. After all, even the most attractive visuals will easily become meaningless for customers if they can’t achieve their intended goal.

7. You don’t need to test enterprise applications.

While most brands jump through hoops to test their mobile applications before releasing them to customers, not every business does the same to their enterprise applications. While it might not create as bigger of an impact as a regular mobile app, it’s essential to realize that they are mission-critical and you shouldn’t ignore that testing.

After all, these are complex yet scalable applications businesses use to solve the problems such as automating business processes, supporting decision-making, and accelerating other business operations. Therefore, even if you’re using it only for internal purposes, thoroughly testing it is vital to ensure it works efficiently and as expected.

8. You can skip exploratory testing.

Exploratory testing helps in the early and quick identification of critical bugs in the development phase. While test automation has simplified many testing processes, this type of testing calls for an in-depth thought process and innovation since it is all about discovering, investigating, and learning.

It’s different from scripted testing in that test cases are absent in exploratory testing. Since there isn’t the risk of missing a crucial feature, it’s vital to define its scope and match it with scripted tests. Not skipping out on exploratory testing will ensure the working of workflows and features as expected.


Mobile applications are the lifeline of modern-day businesses. It’s a wise move to leave no stones unturned when it comes to releasing a top-notch app in the market. With cut-throat competition, the complications with mobile app testing have been ever-increasing.

But the good thing is that implementing the latest technology can help a business develop sophisticated, fully functional, and easy-to-use apps for better customer retention. However, as long as you’re in the maze of the above testing myths, there is no way to make the most of your mobile testing efforts. Therefore, it’s time to ditch the myths and implement what works to embrace an ever-growing return on investment.

Photo credit: The feature image has been done by Dragon Images.

Was this post helpful?

Guest Author
Guest Author
This article has been submitted to us by an external contributor to TechAcute. We appreciate all external contributions but the opinions expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the views of TechAcute.
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -